首页> 外文OA文献 >Bifurcation analysis versus maximum force criteria in formability limit assessment of stretched metal sheets
【2h】

Bifurcation analysis versus maximum force criteria in formability limit assessment of stretched metal sheets

机译:在拉伸金属板的可成形性极限评估中的分叉分析与最大力标准

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The present contribution deals with the prediction of diffuse necking in the context of forming and stretching of metal sheets. For this purpose, two approaches are investigated, namely bifurcation and the maximum force principle, with a systematic comparison of their respective ability to predict necking. While the bifurcation approach is of quite general applicability, some restrictions are shown for the application of maximum force conditions. Although the predictions of the two approaches are identical for particular loading paths and constitutive models, they are generally different, which is even the case for elasticity, confirming the distinct nature of the two concepts. Closed-form expressions of the critical stress and strain states are derived for both criteria in elasto-plasticity and rigid-plasticity for a variety of hardening models. The resulting useful formulas in rigidplasticity are shown to also accurately represent the elasto-plastic critical states for small ratios of the hardening modulus with respect to Young's modulus. Finally, the well-known expression of Swift's diffuse necking criterion, whose foundations are attributed in the literature to the maximum force principle, is shown here to originate from the bifurcation approach instead, providing a sound justification for it.
机译:本发明涉及在金属板的成形和拉伸的情况下的扩散颈缩的预测。为此,研究了两种方法,即分叉法和最大力原理,并比较了它们各自预测颈缩的能力。尽管分叉方法具有相当普遍的适用性,但在最大作用力条件下仍显示出一些限制。尽管对于特定的加载路径和本构模型,这两种方法的预测是相同的,但它们通常是不同的,甚至对于弹性而言,也证实了这两个概念的不同性质。可以针对各种硬化模型的弹塑性和刚性塑性标准导出临界应力和应变状态的闭合形式表达式。结果表明,对于较小的硬化模量相对于杨氏模量的比率,所得到的有用的刚性塑性公式也可以准确地表示弹塑性临界状态。最终,斯威夫特的弥散颈缩准则的著名表达在此被证明是起源于分叉方法,其基础在文献中被归因于最大力原理,为此提供了合理的理由。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号